How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | CRD.BCRAWFORD & CO | LIFEEthos Technologies Inc. | GSHDGoosehead Insurance, Inc. | TWFGTWFG, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding CRD.B |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $12.04▼ 0.16 (1.31%) | $43.53▼ 0.69 (1.56%) | $45.32▼ 1.69 (3.59%) | $26.39▲ 0.65 (2.53%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.7/10 | 8.7/10 | 4.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Market value | $573.0M | $2.84B | $1.13B | $1.55B | |
| Revenue | $1.31B | $387.6M | $365.3M | $248.5M | |
| Profit | $19.6M | $71.2M | $27.8M | $41.2M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -2.2% | 52.0% | — | 22.0% | 37.0% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 28.0% | 98.3% | — | — | 98.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | 18.8% | 20.4% | 14.9% | 18.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 1.5% | 18.4% | 7.6% | 16.6% | 16.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 7.2% | 9.0% | 23.6% | 21.4% | 21.4% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 11.3% | -295.0% | -29.1% | 49.4% | -29.1% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 25.1% | — | 25.1% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 29.18x | 39.88x | 40.67x | 37.64x | 39.88x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 16.21x | 25.26x | 20.74x |
| Price to book | 3.31x | -117.66x | -11.85x | 18.59x | -11.85x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 3.42x | -5.62x | -6.05x | 0.67x | -5.62x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/8 | 5/8 | 5/8 | 7/8 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks |
How CRD.B compares with the others
- CRD.B's profit margin of 1.5% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (16.6%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -2.2% against 37.0%.
- It trades at a lower P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 29.2x against 39.9x.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 3.4x against -5.6x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.