How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | PARABanzai International, Inc. | DAICCID Holdco, Inc. | KASH.CNKASH.CN | MCIMMacau Capital Investments Inc | Median of the restexcluding PARA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | — | |
| Price | $0.4702▼ 0.04 (7.80%) | $1.12▼ 0.12 (9.68%) | C$0.03▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | not reported | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 2.0/10 | not reported | 3.4/10 |
| Market value | $5.0M | $3.2M | $2.2M | $2.5M | |
| Revenue | $12.2M | $5.8M | $1.3K | — | |
| Profit | -$22.5M | -$36.7M | -$763.9K | — | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 168.6% | 3261.7% | -79.8% | — | 1591.0% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 82.0% | 46.0% | -28473.2% | — | -14213.6% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -151.8% | -179.2% | -53659.0% | — | -26919.1% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -184.9% | -632.6% | -58906.6% | — | -29769.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | — | -239.8% | -26679.7% | — | -13459.7% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -279.2% | -15333.3% | -148.9% | — | -7741.1% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -187.1% | -898.6% | -108.0% | — | -503.3% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 0.62x | 13.32x | 4.24x | — | 8.78x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 2.93x | 43.67x | 1.03x | — | 22.35x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/8 | 3/8 | 3/8 | not reported | 3.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | distress | not reported |
How PARA compares with the others
- PARA's operating margin of -151.8% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-26919.1%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 168.6% against 1591.0%.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 2.9x against 22.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.