How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc | MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | ORCLORACLE CORP | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding PANW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $354.92▲ 7.67 (2.21%) | $521.08▼ 11.87 (2.23%) | $125.54▼ 3.59 (2.78%) | $237.94▼ 1.40 (0.58%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 8.7/10 | 10.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $289.26B | $3.87T | $361.56B | $243.64B | |
| Revenue | $11.48B | $331.84B | $67.36B | $4.81B | |
| Profit | $307.0M | $133.75B | $17.09B | -$162.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 24.5% | 17.8% | 17.3% | 21.7% | 17.8% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 70.4% | 67.9% | — | 74.7% | 71.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 6.1% | 46.8% | 30.6% | -6.1% | 30.6% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 2.7% | 40.3% | 25.4% | -3.4% | 25.4% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 35.8% | 20.2% | -35.2% | 27.2% | 20.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 1.1% | 30.2% | 40.2% | -3.7% | 30.2% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 1.6% | 27.1% | 88.4% | — | 57.7% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 942.21x | 28.94x | 21.16x | — | 25.05x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 20.52x | 11.95x | — | 16.24x |
| Price to book | 10.52x | 8.75x | 8.51x | 55.02x | 8.75x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.76x | 0.71x | 5.16x | 1.49x | 1.49x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 3/8 | 6/9 | 5/7 | 4/9 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | safe | distress | grey |
How PANW compares with the others
- PANW's operating margin of 6.1% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (30.6%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 24.5% against 17.8%.
- It trades at a higher P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 942.2x against 25.0x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.8x against 1.5x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.