How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | AURAurora Innovation, Inc. | HUBSHUBSPOT INC | FIGFigma, Inc. | BSYBENTLEY SYSTEMS INC | Median of the restexcluding AUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $5.01▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | $249.90▼ 0.86 (0.34%) | $22.98▲ 0.28 (1.23%) | $39.86▲ 0.45 (1.14%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $9.73B | $13.13B | $7.75B | $12.54B | |
| Revenue | $3.0M | $3.13B | $1.06B | $1.50B | |
| Profit | -$816.0M | $45.9M | -$1.25B | $277.9M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | — | 19.2% | 41.0% | 11.0% | 19.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | -466.7% | 83.8% | 82.4% | 81.5% | 82.4% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -30033.3% | 0.2% | -122.2% | 24.1% | 0.2% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -27200.0% | 1.5% | -118.4% | 18.5% | 1.5% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -20400.0% | 22.6% | 23.3% | 34.6% | 23.3% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -38.1% | 2.2% | -82.8% | 23.4% | 2.2% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -37.1% | 0.4% | -92.1% | 12.4% | 0.4% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 286.06x | — | 45.14x | 165.60x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 4.55x | 6.36x | 5.13x | 10.55x | 6.36x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.09x | 0.87x | 0.55x | 1.99x | 0.87x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 2/7 | 6/8 | 3/8 | 9/9 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | grey | distress | distress |
How AUR compares with the others
- AUR's operating margin of -30033.3% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (0.2%).
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.1x against 0.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.