Loading company financials…
LSE
£3.00
+1.69% · delayed ~15 min
Updated
£518.1M market value
From Plexus Holdings plc's FY2025 annual-report
It took in £4.5M last year, which makes it a small company. It spends more than it earns — losing about 73 cents on every dollar of sales.
The filing does not provide enough evidence for a clear financial conclusion.
A conclusion from the filings, not a recommendation. Detailed figures and supporting evidence appear in their dedicated sections below.
Financial health
Significant financial weakness across most measures.
From Plexus Holdings plc's FY2025 annual filing · share price scored separately
Largest year-over-year changes in FY2025
Revenue
£12.7M → £4.5M
Gross profit
£9.2M → £2.3M
Operating income
£3.6M → -£3.2M
Profit
£2.9M → -£3.3M
Measured against FY2024, from the annual-report
Deteriorated: -64.8%
£12.7M to £4.5MCritical
Why it matters: Sales are what everything else is built on. A fall can be lost customers, lower prices, or a business the company sold — the filing itself says which.
How the latest move compares (quote delayed ~15 min), and what was published around it
POS.L rose 1.69% on the latest quote. The S&P 500 moved −1.04%. That is 2.7 points above the market.
No filing from POS.L and no news item about it appeared in the last 3 days.
These coincide with the move in time. None is presented as its cause: a price can move on news that names no company, on the wider market, or on trading that no document records.
Filter by minute, hour, day or week
Loading price history…
The essentials
Each answered from the filings, with the numbers behind it.
No. It lost £3.3M last year, losing about 73 cents on every dollar of sales.
No. Sales shrank 64.8% last year.
No — it holds more cash than debt, with £2.5M left over after paying off every borrowing. For every $1 it owes, it owns $11.79 in assets. Its operating profit does not cover its interest bill — -541.00x against the interest it owes.
Core operating and valuation reference metrics
Income
This company pays no dividend. It keeps its profits and reinvests them in the business instead, so any return would have to come from the share price.
Figures from the FY2025 annual filing
Last year it lost £3.3M and generated -£703.0K of cash from operations.
Reported annual figures
As reported to the SEC, in GBp. Hover or show sources to see where each figure came from.
| Income statement | FY2025annual-report | FY2024annual-report | FY2023annual-report | FY2022annual-report | ChangeFY2025 vs FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueWhat is this? | £4.5M | £12.7M | £1.5M | £2.3M | −64.8% |
| Cost of revenue | £2.2M | £3.5M | £400.0K | £813.0K | −38.5% |
| Gross profit | £2.3M | £9.2M | £1.1M | £1.5M | −74.9% |
| Gross marginGross profit ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 51.4% | 72.2% | 73.1% | 64.7% | −20.8 pts |
| Selling, general and administrative | £5.5M | £5.6M | £5.3M | £5.8M | −0.5% |
| Operating income | -£3.2M | £3.6M | -£4.3M | -£4.3M | n/m |
| Operating marginOperating income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | -72.4% | 28.3% | -286.6% | -186.1% | −100.8 pts |
| Interest expense | £6.0K | £22.0K | £22.0K | £127.0K | −72.7% |
| Income before tax | -£3.3M | £2.8M | -£4.2M | -£5.6M | n/m |
| Net income | -£3.3M | £2.9M | -£4.0M | -£7.5M | n/m |
| Net marginNet income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | -72.9% | 23.1% | -270.0% | -323.4% | −95.9 pts |
| Earnings per shareNet income ÷ shares outstanding at the period end — close to, but not the same as, the reported EPSWhat is this? | £-0.0189 | £0.0278 | £-0.04 | £-0.0742 | n/m |
† calculated from other reported figures, such as total liabilities as assets minus equity.
Insider activity, ownership stakes and what's coming — straight from EDGAR, before any article is written about it
Nothing recent
No insider trades, pending-sale notices or 5% stake filings from POS.L in the last few months. That is the ordinary case, not a gap.
Not investment advice, and not a signal to act on by itself — a filing says what happened, not why, and insiders trade for ordinary reasons having nothing to do with where they think the company is headed.
Write down why you are following Plexus Holdings plc, what has to go right and what would change your mind, then see each new annual report measured against it. Sign in to start one.
Go deeper
Every figure above traces back to one of these filings.
Straight from SEC EDGAR — the original source for every figure above
No filings found
This company has no recent filings indexed on EDGAR.
Every company's figures are checked for internal consistency: the balance sheet adding up, figures sharing one currency, cash flow and share counts within plausible ranges, and how recent the latest annual report is. Nothing here changes a figure.
Financial figures are from POS.L's annual-report for fiscal year 2025 (period ending 2025-06-30), reported under the US GAAP taxonomy.
3 of 4 scored areas had enough reported figures to judge
The score averages profitability, growth, debt and accounting. Accounting had too few reported figures and is left out of the average rather than counted as a weakness, so a company is never marked down for a figure it did not publish. Cash generation is shown for context and already feeds profitability. Valuation is scored separately, because a share price says nothing about whether the business is sound. 8 of the 9 Piotroski checks could be evaluated. How the score works
Every check behind the three models, and what each one tests
2 of 8 checks passed
Nine yes-or-no tests of whether this year's finances improved on last year's. One could not be evaluated and is excluded from the total rather than counted as a failure.
13.12
In the safe zone
For this model, above 2.6 is safe and below 1.1 is distress.
Distance from bankruptcy, from a model fitted on companies that did and did not go bust. It describes a balance sheet's shape today; it does not forecast a failure.
not reported — This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
Screens eight accounting ratios for the pattern earnings manipulators tend to leave. A flag is a reason to read the filing closely, never evidence of wrongdoing.
Deteriorated: -74.9%
£9.2M to £2.3MCritical
Why it matters: What is left of sales after the direct cost of producing them. It normally moves with revenue, so a move out of step with revenue is the part worth noticing.
Deteriorated: turned negative
£3.6M to -£3.2MCritical
Why it matters: Profit from running the business, before interest and tax. Less exposed than profit to one-off financing and tax items, so a clearer read on the business itself.
Deteriorated: turned negative
£2.9M to -£3.3MCritical
Why it matters: Profit swings far more than sales do, and one-off items — a legal settlement, a tax charge, an asset sale — move it without the underlying business changing.
Deteriorated: −20.8 pts
72.2% to 51.4%Critical
Why it matters: What survives each sale before overheads. Falling gross margin usually means the company is discounting or its input costs rose — it is the earliest place pricing pressure shows.
Deteriorated: −100.8 pts
28.3% to -72.4%Critical
Why it matters: What survives each sale after running the business. A falling operating margin beside a steady gross margin points at overheads — wages, marketing, research — rather than pricing.
Deteriorated: −95.9 pts
23.1% to -72.9%Critical
Why it matters: What survives to the very end of each sale. Worth reading beside revenue: growing sales on a shrinking margin means the company is buying its growth.
Deteriorated: turned negative
£460.0K to -£2.8MCritical
Why it matters: Cash left after paying for the plant that produced it — the money genuinely available for dividends, buybacks or paying down debt. Harder to flatter than profit.
Deteriorated: turned negative
£0.03 to -£0.02Critical
Why it matters: Profit divided by the shares in issue at the period end, so it sits close to but not on the company's own reported figure. It can rise with no growth in profit when the company buys back stock — read it beside the share count.
Deteriorated: +63.9%
105.4M to 172.7MCritical
Why it matters: New shares divide the same company into more pieces, so each existing holding owns slightly less of it. Often pay for staff or an acquisition rather than anything wrong.
Changed: -42.7%
£3.6M to £2.1MCritical
Why it matters: Neither good nor bad on its own. Heavy spending is a company building capacity or a company struggling to stand still, and the two look identical in this figure.
1 other measure barely moved. Figures compare the two most recent annual filings. Moves are graded on fixed lines — 5%, 15% and 40% for amounts, and 1, 3 and 8 points for margins — as notable, significant or critical. Nothing here reads the management commentary, which is where a company explains its own numbers.
Trailing P/E is not meaningful because the latest trailing earnings are zero or negative. The price-to-book and price-to-sales figures below still provide reference points.
This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
Primary sources and further research