Loading company financials…
TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE · Metals & Mining · CIK 0000701818
$22.68
-4.79% · delayed ~15 min
Last price from Oct 22, 2026
$27.21B market value
From KINROSS GOLD CORP's FY2025 40-F, filed Mar 26, 2026 · read the filing
KINROSS GOLD mines metal ores. It took in $7.05B last year, which makes it a mid-sized company. Of every dollar it sells, about 35 cents is left as profit.
The financial picture is led by profitability, growth, debt and accounting.
A conclusion from the filings, not a recommendation. Detailed figures and supporting evidence appear in their dedicated sections below.
Financial health
Strong finances across the board.
From KINROSS GOLD CORP's FY2025 annual filing · share price scored separately
Largest year-over-year changes in FY2025
Gross profit
$1.88B → $3.72B
Operating income
$1.54B → $3.28B
Profit
$994.0M → $2.47B
Gross margin
36.5% → 52.7%
Measured against FY2024, from the 40-F filed Mar 26, 2026
Improved: +97.8%
$1.88B to $3.72BCritical
Why it matters: What is left of sales after the direct cost of producing them. It normally moves with revenue, so a move out of step with revenue is the part worth noticing.
Improved: +112.8%
$1.54B to $3.28BCritical
Why it matters: Profit from running the business, before interest and tax. Less exposed than profit to one-off financing and tax items, so a clearer read on the business itself.
Improved: +148.5%
How the latest move compares (quote delayed ~15 min), and what was published around it
KGC fell 4.79% on the latest quote. The average Materials company tracked here moved −1.12%, and the S&P 500 −1.04%. That is 3.7 points below its sector and 3.7 points below the market.
Expectations
Not from the filings — what other people are betting on, and what the price already assumes.
The growth rate someone buying today is paying for, against what the company has delivered
At today's price, the market is paying for free cash flow to shrink by about 3% a year for the next 10 years. Over the last 9 years it grew by about 21% a year.
The essentials
Each answered from the filings, with the numbers behind it.
Yes. It keeps about 35 cents of every dollar of sales as profit, earning $2.47B last year.
Yes, quickly. Sales grew 36.9% last year.
No — it holds more cash than debt, with $1.00B left over after paying off every borrowing. For every $1 it owes, it owns $3.34 in assets.
Core operating and valuation reference metrics
Income
This company pays no dividend. It keeps its profits and reinvests them in the business instead, so any return would have to come from the share price.
Figures from the FY2025 annual filing
Last year it earned $2.47B and generated $3.76B of cash from operations.
Reported annual figures
As reported to the SEC, in USD. Hover or show sources to see where each figure came from.
| Income statement | FY202540-F · Mar 26, 2026Filing for FY2025 | FY202440-F · Mar 27, 2025Filing for FY2024 | FY202340-F · Mar 27, 2025Filing for FY2023 | FY202240-F · Mar 31, 2023Filing for FY2022 | FY202140-F · Mar 31, 2023Filing for FY2021 | ChangeFY2025 vs FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueWhat is this? | $7.05B | $5.15B | $4.24B | $3.46B | $2.60B | +36.9% |
| Cost of revenue | $3.34B | $3.27B | $3.08B | $2.94B | $2.06B | +2.0% |
| Gross profit | $3.72B | $1.88B | $1.16B | $515.4M | $541.1M | +97.8% |
| Gross marginGross profit ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 52.7% | 36.5% | 27.4% | 14.9% | 20.8% | +16.2 pts |
| Selling, general and administrative | $139.9M | $126.2M | $108.7M | $129.8M | $114.4M | +10.9% |
| Operating income | $3.28B | $1.54B | $801.4M | $117.7M | $72.1M | +112.8% |
| Operating marginOperating income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 46.5% | 29.9% | 18.9% | 3.4% | 2.8% | +16.6 pts |
| Interest expense | $81.8M | $50.5M | $69.0M | $68.2M | $71.6M | +62.0% |
| Income before tax | $3.19B | $1.48B | $708.6M | $106.7M | $84.3M | +115.7% |
| Net income | $2.47B | $994.0M | $415.4M | -$605.7M | $218.7M | +148.5% |
| Net marginNet income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 35.0% | 19.3% | 9.8% | -17.5% | 8.4% | +15.7 pts |
| Earnings per shareNet income ÷ shares outstanding at the period end — close to, but not the same as, the reported EPSWhat is this? | $2.06 | $0.8087 | $0.3383 | $-0.4957 | $0.1758 | +154.6% |
† calculated from other reported figures, such as total liabilities as assets minus equity.
Insider activity, ownership stakes and what's coming — straight from EDGAR, before any article is written about it
Estimated from how often this has happened before, not a confirmed date.
Not investment advice, and not a signal to act on by itself — a filing says what happened, not why, and insiders trade for ordinary reasons having nothing to do with where they think the company is headed.
20 recent filings, newest first. Each is labelled from its form and item numbers, not from its wording.
Report filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingWrite down why you are following KINROSS GOLD CORP, what has to go right and what would change your mind, then see each new annual report measured against it. Sign in to start one.
Go deeper
Every figure above traces back to a filing in the timeline, each linked to the document itself.
Coverage from the last 30 days
KINROSS GOLD CORP (NYSE:KGC): A GARP Case Study in Growth at a Reasonable Price
ChartMill ·
Kinross Gold (KGC) Earnings Expected to Grow: Should You Buy?
Yahoo ·
Is There A Risk Hiding In Newmont Stock's Strong Cash Flow?
Yahoo ·
3 Canadian Stocks With ROE Over 27%
Yahoo ·
If You Invested $1000 In Kinross Gold Stock 5 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today
Benzinga ·
Every company's figures are checked for internal consistency: the balance sheet adding up, figures sharing one currency, cash flow and share counts within plausible ranges, and how recent the latest annual report is. Nothing here changes a figure.
Financial figures are from KGC's 40-F for fiscal year 2025 (period ending 2025-12-31, filed Mar 26, 2026), reported under the IFRS taxonomy. View the source filing.
4 of 4 scored areas had enough reported figures to judge
The score averages profitability, growth, debt and accounting. All four had enough reported figures. Cash generation is shown for context and already feeds profitability. Valuation is scored separately, because a share price says nothing about whether the business is sound. 9 of the 9 Piotroski checks could be evaluated. How the score works
Each year scored only from its annual report as it was first filed
| Fiscal year | Health | F-Score | Scored from |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 10.0 | 9/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 26, 2026 |
| FY2024 | 8.0 | 8/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 27, 2025 |
| FY2023 | 6.0 | 7/7 | 40-F, filed Mar 27, 2024 |
| FY2022 | 4.7 | 2/7 | 40-F, filed Mar 31, 2023 |
| FY2021 | 3.0 | 5/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 31, 2022 |
| FY2020 | 8.0 | 8/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 30, 2021 |
A later restatement never reaches back into an earlier year, and every year is scored without a share price, so the latest point can differ a little from the headline score, which uses today's price.
Every check behind the three models, and what each one tests
9 of 9 checks passed
Nine yes-or-no tests of whether this year's finances improved on last year's.
3.67
In the safe zone
For this model, above 2.6 is safe and below 1.1 is distress.
Distance from bankruptcy, from a model fitted on companies that did and did not go bust. It describes a balance sheet's shape today; it does not forecast a failure.
-3.25
Below the threshold — nothing unusual flagged
Scores above -1.78 are the ones the model associates with earnings manipulation.
Screens eight accounting ratios for the pattern earnings manipulators tend to leave. A flag is a reason to read the filing closely, never evidence of wrongdoing.
Every figure above comes from the FY2025 filing as filed with the SEC.
$994.0M to $2.47BCritical
Why it matters: Profit swings far more than sales do, and one-off items — a legal settlement, a tax charge, an asset sale — move it without the underlying business changing.
Improved: +16.2 pts
36.5% to 52.7%Critical
Why it matters: What survives each sale before overheads. Falling gross margin usually means the company is discounting or its input costs rose — it is the earliest place pricing pressure shows.
Improved: +16.6 pts
29.9% to 46.5%Critical
Why it matters: What survives each sale after running the business. A falling operating margin beside a steady gross margin points at overheads — wages, marketing, research — rather than pricing.
Improved: +15.7 pts
19.3% to 35.0%Critical
Why it matters: What survives to the very end of each sale. Worth reading beside revenue: growing sales on a shrinking margin means the company is buying its growth.
Improved: +87.2%
$1.37B to $2.57BCritical
Why it matters: Cash left after paying for the plant that produced it — the money genuinely available for dividends, buybacks or paying down debt. Harder to flatter than profit.
Improved: +154.6%
$0.81 to $2.06Critical
Why it matters: Profit divided by the shares in issue at the period end, so it sits close to but not on the company's own reported figure. It can rise with no growth in profit when the company buys back stock — read it beside the share count.
Improved: -40.3%
$1.24B to $738.2MCritical
Why it matters: Rising debt is not automatically bad — borrowing to build something that earns more than the interest is ordinary. It matters when it grows faster than the profit meant to service it.
Improved: +184.9%
$611.5M to $1.74BCritical
Why it matters: A falling cash pile is only a warning if the company is consuming it. Paying down debt, buying back stock and paying a dividend all reduce cash by choice.
Improved: +36.9%
$5.15B to $7.05BSignificant
Why it matters: Sales are what everything else is built on. A fall can be lost customers, lower prices, or a business the company sold — the filing itself says which.
Improved: -2.4%
1.23B to 1.20BNotable
Why it matters: The company bought back stock, so each remaining holding owns slightly more of it. Worth checking it was not funded by borrowing.
Changed: +11.0%
$1.08B to $1.19BNotable
Why it matters: Neither good nor bad on its own. Heavy spending is a company building capacity or a company struggling to stand still, and the two look identical in this figure.
Figures compare the two most recent annual filings — read the latest one. Moves are graded on fixed lines — 5%, 15% and 40% for amounts, and 1, 3 and 8 points for margins — as notable, significant or critical. Nothing here reads the management commentary, which is where a company explains its own numbers.
These coincide with the move in time. None is presented as its cause: a price can move on news that names no company, on the wider market, or on trading that no document records.
Filter by minute, hour, day or week — or compare against peers
Loading price history…
Discounted at 8%–10% a year, with growth settling to 2.5% after 10 years. Those rates are ordinary choices, not measurements: across that range the assumed growth works out between -5% and -2%. This describes what the price implies — it is not a forecast, and not a view on whether the price is right.
Opinions from 15 analysts covering this company, as of . Their views, not this site's.
Of 15 analysts publishing on this company, 2 say strong buy, 12 say buy and 1 say hold. Analysts are paid to publish a view and are wrong often; the split above says how much they agree with each other, which is the part a single headline rating hides.
Published by Finnhub. Analyst coverage skews towards larger companies and towards optimism — sell ratings are rare across the whole market, so a company with none is ordinary rather than endorsed.
Measured on and published about a week later — this is a fortnightly snapshot, not a live position.
About 1.4% of this company's shares have been borrowed and sold by people expecting to buy them back cheaper. That is a bet the price falls. Those people can be wrong, and when a heavily shorted share rises they have to buy it back, which pushes it up further.
Collected by FINRA from broker-dealers twice a month. It counts positions, not intentions, and some of it is hedging rather than a directional bet against the company.
Nothing in this section is a figure this company reported about itself. These are expectations and positions — what the price implies, what analysts have published, what short sellers are betting, and what large funds held at the last count. WylthIQ reports them; it does not endorse them, does not forecast prices, and takes no view on whether any of them will turn out to be right.
The trailing P/E is 11.0x — investors pay $11.0 for each $1 of trailing profit.
Nothing unusual. Its accounting patterns look like those of companies that report earnings straightforwardly.
Report filed on Form 6-K
Report filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingAnnual report for FY2025
Revenue +36.9% · Operating margin +16.6 pts · Gross profit +97.8% — against FY2024
Read the filingPrimary sources and further research