Loading company financials…
NYSE MKT LLC · Chemicals · CIK 0001472326
$1.78
-13.17% · live
Updated
$95.6M market value
From Brazil Potash Corp.'s FY2025 20-F, filed Mar 23, 2026 · read the filing
Brazil Potash quarries stone, sand and minerals.
The filing does not provide enough evidence for a clear financial conclusion.
A conclusion from the filings, not a recommendation. Detailed figures and supporting evidence appear in their dedicated sections below.
Financial health
Significant financial weakness across most measures.
From Brazil Potash Corp.'s FY2025 annual filing · share price scored separately
Largest year-over-year changes in FY2025
Cash
$18.9M → $27.8M
Shares in issue
38.4M → 53.7M
Capital spending
$5.2K → $22.5K
Operating income
-$46.6M → -$54.9M
Measured against FY2024, from the 20-F filed Mar 23, 2026
Improved: +47.3%
$18.9M to $27.8MCritical
Why it matters: A falling cash pile is only a warning if the company is consuming it. Paying down debt, buying back stock and paying a dividend all reduce cash by choice.
How the latest move compares (quote live), and what was published around it
GRO fell 13.17% on the latest quote. The average Materials company tracked here moved −1.23%, and the S&P 500 −1.04%. That is 11.9 points below its sector and 12.1 points below the market.
No filing from GRO and no news item about it appeared in the last 3 days.
These coincide with the move in time. None is presented as its cause: a price can move on news that names no company, on the wider market, or on trading that no document records.
Filter by minute, hour, day or week — or compare against peers
Loading price history…
Expectations
Not from the filings — what other people are betting on, and what the price already assumes.
Opinions from 9 analysts covering this company, as of . Their views, not this site's.
Of 9 analysts publishing on this company, 1 say strong buy, 7 say buy and 1 say hold. Analysts are paid to publish a view and are wrong often; the split above says how much they agree with each other, which is the part a single headline rating hides.
Published by Finnhub. Analyst coverage skews towards larger companies and towards optimism — sell ratings are rare across the whole market, so a company with none is ordinary rather than endorsed.
The essentials
Each answered from the filings, with the numbers behind it.
No. It lost $52.2M last year.
Not enough history has been reported to judge growth.
It does not appear so. For every $1 it owes, it owns $15.08 in assets. Its operating profit does not cover its interest bill — -54.40x against the interest it owes.
Core operating and valuation reference metrics
Income
This company pays no dividend. It keeps its profits and reinvests them in the business instead, so any return would have to come from the share price.
Figures from the FY2025 annual filing
Last year it lost $52.2M and generated -$13.2M of cash from operations.
Reported annual figures
As reported to the SEC, in USD. Hover or show sources to see where each figure came from.
| Income statement | FY202520-F · Mar 23, 2026Filing for FY2025 | FY202420-F · Apr 9, 2025Filing for FY2024 | FY202320-F/A · Apr 9, 2025Filing for FY2023 | FY202220-F/A · Apr 9, 2025Filing for FY2022 | ChangeFY2025 vs FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selling, general and administrative | $1.4M | $252.0K | $120.2K | $183.8K | +462.1% |
| Operating income | -$54.9M | -$46.6M | -$13.3M | -$32.7M | −17.7% |
| Interest expense | $1.0M | — | — | — | — |
| Income before tax | -$51.8M | -$46.2M | -$13.0M | -$32.5M | −12.1% |
| Net income | -$52.2M | -$46.4M | -$13.2M | -$32.6M | −12.4% |
| Earnings per shareNet income ÷ shares outstanding at the period end — close to, but not the same as, the reported EPSWhat is this? | $-0.9714 | $-1.21 | $-0.3711 | $-0.9259 | +19.6% |
† calculated from other reported figures, such as total liabilities as assets minus equity.
Insider activity, ownership stakes and what's coming — straight from EDGAR, before any article is written about it
Nothing recent
No insider trades, pending-sale notices or 5% stake filings from GRO in the last few months. That is the ordinary case, not a gap.
Not investment advice, and not a signal to act on by itself — a filing says what happened, not why, and insiders trade for ordinary reasons having nothing to do with where they think the company is headed.
20 recent filings, newest first. Each is labelled from its form and item numbers, not from its wording.
Report filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingWrite down why you are following Brazil Potash Corp., what has to go right and what would change your mind, then see each new annual report measured against it. Sign in to start one.
Go deeper
Every figure above traces back to a filing in the timeline, each linked to the document itself.
Coverage from the last 30 days
Brazil Potash AI-Powered X-Ray Transmission Sorting Testing Shows Potential for Higher Production and Longer Mine Life
Yahoo ·
Brazil Potash Announces Encouraging Initial Results From Testing Of AI-Powered X-Ray Transmission Sorting Technology, Initiated When First Announced In December 2025
Benzinga ·
Brazil Potash: Bull Case Is Starting To (Slowly) Bloom
SeekingAlpha ·
Reported Earlier, Agibank Secures R$2.5B In Second FIDC Structuring To Scale Secured Lending As Total Credit Portfolio Hits R$34.9B
Benzinga ·
Every company's figures are checked for internal consistency: the balance sheet adding up, figures sharing one currency, cash flow and share counts within plausible ranges, and how recent the latest annual report is. Nothing here changes a figure.
Financial figures are from GRO's 20-F for fiscal year 2025 (period ending 2025-12-31, filed Mar 23, 2026), reported under the IFRS taxonomy. View the source filing.
2 of 4 scored areas had enough reported figures to judge
The score averages profitability, growth, debt and accounting. Growth and Accounting had too few reported figures and are left out of the average rather than counted as a weakness, so a company is never marked down for a figure it did not publish. Cash generation is shown for context and already feeds profitability. Valuation is scored separately, because a share price says nothing about whether the business is sound. 6 of the 9 Piotroski checks could be evaluated. How the score works
Each year scored only from its annual report as it was first filed
| Fiscal year | Health | F-Score | Scored from |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 2.0 | 2/6 | 20-F, filed Mar 23, 2026 |
| FY2024 | 6.0 | 2/6 | 20-F/A, filed Apr 9, 2025 |
| FY2023 | 6.0 | 2/4 | 20-F/A, filed Apr 9, 2025 |
| FY2022 | 2.0 | 1/2 | 20-F/A, filed Apr 9, 2025 |
A later restatement never reaches back into an earlier year, and every year is scored without a share price, so the latest point can differ a little from the headline score, which uses today's price.
Every check behind the three models, and what each one tests
2 of 6 checks passed
Nine yes-or-no tests of whether this year's finances improved on last year's. 3 could not be evaluated and are excluded from the total rather than counted as failures.
9.82
In the safe zone
For this model, above 2.6 is safe and below 1.1 is distress.
Distance from bankruptcy, from a model fitted on companies that did and did not go bust. It describes a balance sheet's shape today; it does not forecast a failure.
not reported — This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
Screens eight accounting ratios for the pattern earnings manipulators tend to leave. A flag is a reason to read the filing closely, never evidence of wrongdoing.
Every figure above comes from the FY2025 filing as filed with the SEC.
Deteriorated: +39.8%
38.4M to 53.7MCritical
Why it matters: New shares divide the same company into more pieces, so each existing holding owns slightly less of it. Often pay for staff or an acquisition rather than anything wrong.
Changed: +329.6%
$5.2K to $22.5KCritical
Why it matters: Neither good nor bad on its own. Heavy spending is a company building capacity or a company struggling to stand still, and the two look identical in this figure.
Deteriorated: $8.2M wider
-$46.6M to -$54.9MSignificant
Why it matters: Profit from running the business, before interest and tax. Less exposed than profit to one-off financing and tax items, so a clearer read on the business itself.
Deteriorated: $1.9M wider
-$11.3M to -$13.2MSignificant
Why it matters: Cash left after paying for the plant that produced it — the money genuinely available for dividends, buybacks or paying down debt. Harder to flatter than profit.
Improved: $0.24 narrower
-$1.21 to -$0.97Significant
Why it matters: Profit divided by the shares in issue at the period end, so it sits close to but not on the company's own reported figure. It can rise with no growth in profit when the company buys back stock — read it beside the share count.
Deteriorated: $5.8M wider
-$46.4M to -$52.2MNotable
Why it matters: Profit swings far more than sales do, and one-off items — a legal settlement, a tax charge, an asset sale — move it without the underlying business changing.
Figures compare the two most recent annual filings — read the latest one. Moves are graded on fixed lines — 5%, 15% and 40% for amounts, and 1, 3 and 8 points for margins — as notable, significant or critical. Nothing here reads the management commentary, which is where a company explains its own numbers.
Measured on and published about a week later — this is a fortnightly snapshot, not a live position.
About 0.6% of this company's shares have been borrowed and sold by people expecting to buy them back cheaper. That is a bet the price falls. Those people can be wrong, and when a heavily shorted share rises they have to buy it back, which pushes it up further.
Collected by FINRA from broker-dealers twice a month. It counts positions, not intentions, and some of it is hedging rather than a directional bet against the company.
Nothing in this section is a figure this company reported about itself. These are expectations and positions — what the price implies, what analysts have published, what short sellers are betting, and what large funds held at the last count. WylthIQ reports them; it does not endorse them, does not forecast prices, and takes no view on whether any of them will turn out to be right.
Trailing P/E is not meaningful because the latest trailing earnings are zero or negative. The price-to-book and price-to-sales figures below still provide reference points.
This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
Report filed on Form 6-K
Report filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingAnnual report for FY2025
Cash +47.3% · Shares in issue +39.8% · Capital spending +329.6% — against FY2024
Read the filingAnnual report for FY2025
Cash +47.3% · Shares in issue +39.8% · Capital spending +329.6% — against FY2024
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingPatria Investments shares are trading lower after the company reported worse-than-expected Q2 financial results.
Benzinga ·
Primary sources and further research