Loading company financials…
NYSE MKT LLC · Real Estate · CIK 0001031316
$0.3876
+2.81% · live
Updated
$40.2M market value
From FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP /MA/'s FY2025 10-K, filed Mar 9, 2026 · read the filing
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES /MA/ owns income-producing property as a REIT. It took in $107.2M last year, which makes it a smaller company. It spends more than it earns — losing about 42 cents on every dollar of sales.
The financial picture is mixed, with debt needing attention and profitability and growth weaker.
A conclusion from the filings, not a recommendation. Detailed figures and supporting evidence appear in their dedicated sections below.
Financial health
Several areas of financial weakness.
From FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP /MA/'s FY2025 annual filing · share price scored separately
Largest year-over-year changes in FY2025
Free cash flow
-$16.2M → -$12.7M
Cash
$41.1M → $30.6M
Capital spending
$25.2M → $16.4M
Revenue
$120.1M → $107.2M
Measured against FY2024, from the 10-K filed Mar 9, 2026
Improved: $3.6M narrower
-$16.2M to -$12.7MSignificant
Why it matters: Cash left after paying for the plant that produced it — the money genuinely available for dividends, buybacks or paying down debt. Harder to flatter than profit.
How the latest move compares (quote live), and what was published around it
FSP rose 2.81% on the latest quote. The average Real Estate company tracked here moved +1.90%, and the S&P 500 −1.04%. That is 0.9 points above its sector and 3.9 points above the market.
These coincide with the move in time. None is presented as its cause: a price can move on news that names no company, on the wider market, or on trading that no document records.
Expectations
Not from the filings — what other people are betting on, and what the price already assumes.
Opinions from 8 analysts covering this company, as of . Their views, not this site's.
Of 8 analysts publishing on this company, 3 say hold, 4 say sell and 1 say strong sell. Analysts are paid to publish a view and are wrong often; the split above says how much they agree with each other, which is the part a single headline rating hides.
Published by Finnhub. Analyst coverage skews towards larger companies and towards optimism — sell ratings are rare across the whole market, so a company with none is ordinary rather than endorsed.
The essentials
Each answered from the filings, with the numbers behind it.
No. It lost $45.0M last year, losing about 42 cents on every dollar of sales.
No. Sales shrank 10.8% last year.
For every $1 it owes, it owns $3.12 in assets. Banks and insurers always carry high debt — that is how lending works — so this is normal for the industry and not comparable with other sectors.
Core operating and valuation reference metrics
Whether the dividend is covered by what the business actually earns
It paid a dividend while making a loss, so the payment did not come out of profits — it came from reserves, borrowing or asset sales. It paid out 110% of the cash its operations generated. It has paid in each of the last 12 years.
WeakFigures from the FY2025 annual filing
Last year it lost $45.0M and generated $3.8M of cash from operations.
As reported to the SEC, in USD. Hover or show sources to see where each figure came from.
| Income statement | FY202510-K · Mar 9, 2026Filing for FY2025 | FY202410-K · Feb 11, 2025Filing for FY2024 | FY202310-K · Feb 11, 2025Filing for FY2023 | FY202210-K · Feb 11, 2025Filing for FY2022 | FY202110-K · Feb 15, 2022Filing for FY2021 | ChangeFY2025 vs FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueWhat is this? | $107.2M | $120.1M | $145.7M | $165.6M | $209.4M | −10.8% |
| Cost of revenue | $42.0M | $45.0M | $50.7M | $52.8M | $60.9M | −6.7% |
| Gross profit | $65.1M† | $75.1M† | $95.0M† | $112.8M† | $148.5M† | −13.3% |
| Gross marginGross profit ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 60.8% | 62.5% | 65.2% | 68.1% | 70.9% | −1.7 pts |
| Selling, general and administrative | $12.4M | $13.9M | $14.0M | $13.9M | $15.9M | −10.5% |
| Interest expense | — | — | $24.3M | $22.8M | $32.3M | — |
| Income before tax | -$44.8M | -$52.5M | -$47.8M | $1.3M | $92.9M | +14.7% |
| Net income | -$45.0M | -$52.7M | -$48.1M | $1.1M | $92.7M | +14.7% |
| Net marginNet income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | -42.0% | -43.9% | -33.0% | 0.7% | 44.3% | +1.9 pts |
| Earnings per shareNet income ÷ shares outstanding at the period end — close to, but not the same as, the reported EPSWhat is this? | $-0.4336 | $-0.5091 | $-0.4651 | $0.0106 | $0.8915 | +14.8% |
† calculated from other reported figures, such as total liabilities as assets minus equity.
This company's latest filing beside its peers' stored scores
| Company | Health | F-Score | Revenue growth | Profit margin | P/E | Debt to equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSPFRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP /MA/ · this page | 3.3/10 | 4/7 | -10.8% | -42.0% |
Insider activity, ownership stakes and what's coming — straight from EDGAR, before any article is written about it
Nothing recent
No insider trades, pending-sale notices or 5% stake filings from FSP in the last few months. That is the ordinary case, not a gap.
Not investment advice, and not a signal to act on by itself — a filing says what happened, not why, and insiders trade for ordinary reasons having nothing to do with where they think the company is headed.
20 recent filings, newest first. Each is labelled from its form and item numbers, not from its wording.
Quarterly report on Form 10-Q
Read the filingPublished results
Read the filingWrite down why you are following FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP /MA/, what has to go right and what would change your mind, then see each new annual report measured against it. Sign in to start one.
Go deeper
Every figure above traces back to a filing in the timeline, each linked to the document itself.
The 35 subsidiaries named in its 10-K. A filer lists the significant ones and may leave the rest out, so this is the floor rather than the full count.
Every company's figures are checked for internal consistency: the balance sheet adding up, figures sharing one currency, cash flow and share counts within plausible ranges, and how recent the latest annual report is. Nothing here changes a figure.
Financial figures are from FSP's 10-K for fiscal year 2025 (period ending 2025-12-31, filed Mar 9, 2026), reported under the US GAAP taxonomy. View the source filing.
3 of 4 scored areas had enough reported figures to judge
The score averages profitability, growth, debt and accounting. Accounting had too few reported figures and is left out of the average rather than counted as a weakness, so a company is never marked down for a figure it did not publish. Cash generation is shown for context and already feeds profitability. Valuation is scored separately, because a share price says nothing about whether the business is sound. 7 of the 9 Piotroski checks could be evaluated. How the score works
Each year scored only from its annual report as it was first filed
| Fiscal year | Health | F-Score | Scored from |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 3.3 | 4/7 | 10-K, filed Mar 9, 2026 |
| FY2024 | 3.3 | 4/7 | 10-K, filed Feb 11, 2025 |
| FY2023 | 3.3 | 3/7 | 10-K, filed Feb 26, 2024 |
| FY2022 | 4.7 | 4/7 | 10-K, filed Feb 14, 2023 |
| FY2021 | 4.7 | 5/7 | 10-K, filed Feb 15, 2022 |
| FY2020 | 4.7 | 5/7 | 10-K, filed Feb 16, 2021 |
A later restatement never reaches back into an earlier year, and every year is scored without a share price, so the latest point can differ a little from the headline score, which uses today's price.
Every check behind the three models, and what each one tests
4 of 7 checks passed
Nine yes-or-no tests of whether this year's finances improved on last year's. 2 could not be evaluated and are excluded from the total rather than counted as failures.
not reported — Not meaningful for banks, insurers and other financial companies. Their balance sheets have no working capital and are leveraged by design, which this model misreads as distress.
Not meaningful for banks, insurers and other financial companies. Their balance sheets have no working capital and are leveraged by design, which this model misreads as distress.
Distance from bankruptcy, from a model fitted on companies that did and did not go bust. It describes a balance sheet's shape today; it does not forecast a failure.
not reported — Not meaningful for banks, insurers and other financial companies. Their balance sheets have no working capital and are leveraged by design, which this model misreads as distress.
Not meaningful for banks, insurers and other financial companies. Their balance sheets have no working capital and are leveraged by design, which this model misreads as distress.
Screens eight accounting ratios for the pattern earnings manipulators tend to leave. A flag is a reason to read the filing closely, never evidence of wrongdoing.
Every figure above comes from the FY2025 filing as filed with the SEC.
Deteriorated: -25.7%
$41.1M to $30.6MSignificant
Why it matters: A falling cash pile is only a warning if the company is consuming it. Paying down debt, buying back stock and paying a dividend all reduce cash by choice.
Changed: -34.9%
$25.2M to $16.4MSignificant
Why it matters: Neither good nor bad on its own. Heavy spending is a company building capacity or a company struggling to stand still, and the two look identical in this figure.
Deteriorated: -10.8%
$120.1M to $107.2MNotable
Why it matters: Sales are what everything else is built on. A fall can be lost customers, lower prices, or a business the company sold — the filing itself says which.
Deteriorated: -13.3%
$75.1M to $65.1MNotable
Why it matters: What is left of sales after the direct cost of producing them. It normally moves with revenue, so a move out of step with revenue is the part worth noticing.
Improved: $7.8M narrower
-$52.7M to -$45.0MNotable
Why it matters: Profit swings far more than sales do, and one-off items — a legal settlement, a tax charge, an asset sale — move it without the underlying business changing.
Deteriorated: −1.7 pts
62.5% to 60.8%Notable
Why it matters: What survives each sale before overheads. Falling gross margin usually means the company is discounting or its input costs rose — it is the earliest place pricing pressure shows.
Improved: +1.9 pts
-43.9% to -42.0%Notable
Why it matters: What survives to the very end of each sale. Worth reading beside revenue: growing sales on a shrinking margin means the company is buying its growth.
Improved: $0.08 narrower
-$0.51 to -$0.43Notable
Why it matters: Profit divided by the shares in issue at the period end, so it sits close to but not on the company's own reported figure. It can rise with no growth in profit when the company buys back stock — read it beside the share count.
Q1 FY2026 against Q1 FY2025, from the 10-Q filed Apr 28, 2026 — read it.
Improved: $11.9M narrower
-$21.4M to -$9.5MCritical
Why it matters: Profit swings far more than sales do, and one-off items — a legal settlement, a tax charge, an asset sale — move it without the underlying business changing.
Improved: +42.8 pts
-79.1% to -36.3%Critical
Why it matters: What survives to the very end of each sale. Worth reading beside revenue: growing sales on a shrinking margin means the company is buying its growth.
Improved: $0.12 narrower
-$0.21 to -$0.09Critical
Why it matters: Profit divided by the shares in issue at the period end, so it sits close to but not on the company's own reported figure. It can rise with no growth in profit when the company buys back stock — read it beside the share count.
Improved: $2.1M narrower
-$9.9M to -$7.8MSignificant
Why it matters: Cash left after paying for the plant that produced it — the money genuinely available for dividends, buybacks or paying down debt. Harder to flatter than profit.
Deteriorated: -21.3%
$30.2M to $23.8MSignificant
Why it matters: A falling cash pile is only a warning if the company is consuming it. Paying down debt, buying back stock and paying a dividend all reduce cash by choice.
Changed: -39.5%
$4.5M to $2.7MSignificant
Why it matters: Neither good nor bad on its own. Heavy spending is a company building capacity or a company struggling to stand still, and the two look identical in this figure.
Deteriorated: -6.3%
$17.0M to $15.9MNotable
Why it matters: What is left of sales after the direct cost of producing them. It normally moves with revenue, so a move out of step with revenue is the part worth noticing.
Deteriorated: −2.0 pts
62.8% to 60.8%Notable
Why it matters: What survives each sale before overheads. Falling gross margin usually means the company is discounting or its input costs rose — it is the earliest place pricing pressure shows.
2 other measures barely moved. Figures compare the two most recent annual filings — read the latest one. Moves are graded on fixed lines — 5%, 15% and 40% for amounts, and 1, 3 and 8 points for margins — as notable, significant or critical. Nothing here reads the management commentary, which is where a company explains its own numbers.
Filter by minute, hour, day or week — or compare against peers
Loading price history…
Measured on and published about a week later — this is a fortnightly snapshot, not a live position.
About 1.4% of this company's shares have been borrowed and sold by people expecting to buy them back cheaper. That is a bet the price falls. Those people can be wrong, and when a heavily shorted share rises they have to buy it back, which pushes it up further.
Collected by FINRA from broker-dealers twice a month. It counts positions, not intentions, and some of it is hedging rather than a directional bet against the company.
Nothing in this section is a figure this company reported about itself. These are expectations and positions — what the price implies, what analysts have published, what short sellers are betting, and what large funds held at the last count. WylthIQ reports them; it does not endorse them, does not forecast prices, and takes no view on whether any of them will turn out to be right.
Trailing P/E is not meaningful because the latest trailing earnings are zero or negative. The price-to-book and price-to-sales figures below still provide reference points.
Not meaningful for banks, insurers and other financial companies. Their balance sheets have no working capital and are leveraged by design, which this model misreads as distress.
Reported annual figures
| — |
| 0.47x |
| BXPBXP, Inc. | 6.0/10 | 6/7 | 2.2% | 7.9% | 35.22x | 3.59x |
|---|
| Median of peers | 6.0/10 | — | 2.2% | 7.9% | 35.22x | 3.59x |
|---|
Peers come from the company's industry classification. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.
Completed an acquisition or disposal
Held a shareholder vote
Read the filingQuarterly report for Q1 FY2026
Profit margin +42.8 pts · Profit $11.9M narrower · Earnings per share $0.12 narrower — against Q1 FY2025
Read the filingPublished results
Read the filingProxy statement for a shareholder meeting
Read the filingAnnual report for FY2025
Revenue -10.8% · Profit margin +1.9 pts · Free cash flow $3.6M narrower — against FY2024
Read the filingPublished results
Read the filingSigned a material agreement · Terminated a material agreement · Took on a direct financial obligation · Had a director or senior officer leave or join · Reported another event
Read the filingQuarterly report for Q3 FY2025
Revenue -8.0% · Profit margin +22.1 pts · Profit $7.3M narrower — against Q3 FY2024
Read the filingPublished results
Read the filingSigned a material agreement · Had a director or senior officer leave or join
Read the filingQuarterly report for Q2 FY2025
Revenue -13.3% · Profit margin +38.7 pts · Profit $13.1M narrower — against Q2 FY2024
Read the filingPublished results
Read the filingHeld a shareholder vote
Read the filingQuarterly report for Q1 FY2025
Revenue -13.2% · Profit margin −54.9 pts · Profit $13.9M wider — against Q1 FY2024
Read the filingPublished results
Read the filingProxy statement for a shareholder meeting
Read the filingHad a director or senior officer leave or join
Read the filingSource: Exhibit 21 of the 10-K filed 2026-03-09. These are legal entities, not brands or acquisitions — a company that bought a business may hold it inside an entity named here, or inside one small enough that the rule does not require naming it at all.
Coverage from the last 30 days
Primary sources and further research