How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | UNMUnum Group | METMETLIFE INC | AFLAFLAC INC | PRUPRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC | Median of the restexcluding UNM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $93.75▲ 0.04 (0.04%) | $103.57▲ 1.39 (1.36%) | $123.27▲ 3.12 (2.60%) | $114.82▼ 0.45 (0.39%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 3.3/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $16.57B | $67.87B | $63.94B | $40.65B | |
| Revenue | $13.08B | $2.44B | $17.16B | $60.77B | |
| Profit | $738.5M | $3.38B | $3.65B | $3.58B | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 1.5% | 8.5% | -9.3% | -13.7% | -9.3% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | 251.9% | — | — | 251.9% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 5.6% | 138.7% | 21.2% | 5.9% | 21.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 4.2% | — | — | — | — |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 6.6% | 11.9% | 12.4% | 11.0% | 11.9% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | 66.2% | — | — | 66.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 22.44x | 20.09x | 17.54x | 11.37x | 17.54x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 7.39x | — | — | 7.39x |
| Price to book | 1.49x | 2.39x | 2.17x | 1.25x | 2.17x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 4.71x | 25.22x | 2.95x | 22.76x | 22.76x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 3/7 | 4/6 | 3/6 | 6/7 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks |
How UNM compares with the others
- UNM's profit margin of 5.6% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (21.2%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 1.5% against -9.3%.
- It trades at a higher P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 22.4x against 17.5x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 4.7x against 22.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.