How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | TULPBLOOMIA HOLDINGS, INC. | MOBQMobiquity Technologies, Inc. | XHLDTEN Holdings, Inc. | CDLXCardlytics, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding TULP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $2.28▲ 0.15 (7.04%) | $0.43▼ 0.05 (10.42%) | $0.7611▼ 0.03 (3.82%) | $1.81▼ 0.06 (3.21%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Market value | $11.0M | $10.1M | $10.9M | $11.0M | |
| Revenue | $48.1M | $112.3K | $3.1M | $212.3M | |
| Profit | -$11.2M | -$10.4M | -$19.5M | -$103.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | — | -94.6% | -11.4% | -16.9% | -16.9% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 16.4% | 21.4% | 78.6% | — | 50.0% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -35.0% | -8455.5% | -432.5% | -48.0% | -432.5% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -23.2% | -9290.1% | -628.5% | -48.7% | -628.5% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -9.2% | -4768.1% | — | 4.1% | -2382.0% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -84.0% | -871.4% | -455.9% | 1590.2% | -455.9% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -40.9% | -139.5% | -400.5% | -51.1% | -139.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 0.83x | 8.46x | 2.54x | -1.69x | 2.54x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 5.34x | 3.81x | 1.80x | -44.89x | 1.80x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 3/6 | 1/9 | 2/8 | 5/8 | 2.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | distress | distress |
How TULP compares with the others
- TULP's operating margin of -35.0% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-432.5%).
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 5.3x against 1.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.