How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | TONXTON Strategy Co | HUCKHuckleberry.ai, Inc. | EGANEGAIN Corp | Median of the restexcluding TRAK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $7.23▼ 0.03 (0.41%) | $2.96▼ 0.15 (4.82%) | $3.10▲ 0.03 (0.81%) | $5.67▼ 0.01 (0.18%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 9.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 5.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $131.5M | $167.3M | $127.1M | $148.4M | |
| Revenue | $23.3M | $12.8M | $318.9M | $91.1M | |
| Profit | $7.6M | -$148.5M | -$59.3M | $8.9M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 3.0% | 1327.8% | 0.6% | 3.1% | 3.1% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 85.8% | 69.5% | 75.0% | 73.4% | 73.4% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 33.7% | -285.2% | -12.3% | 8.7% | -12.3% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 32.5% | -1161.9% | -18.6% | 9.7% | -18.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 35.2% | -163.2% | -0.6% | 22.5% | -0.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 14.5% | -36.5% | 31.9% | 10.5% | 10.5% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 11.9% | -7.8% | — | 60.2% | 26.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 17.37x | — | — | 16.72x | 16.72x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 15.52x | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 2.51x | 0.41x | -0.68x | 1.76x | 0.41x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.16x | 0.01x | -2.27x | 0.76x | 0.01x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 7/9 | 2/8 | 6/9 | 7/8 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | n/a for banks | distress | distress |
How TRAK compares with the others
- TRAK's operating margin of 33.7% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-12.3%).
- Its revenue growth of 3.0% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (3.1%).
- It trades at a P/E in line with the other company selected (17.4x against 16.7x).
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.2x against 0.0x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.