How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | QMLSQumulusAI, Inc. | ZPTAZapata Quantum, Inc. | SLNHSoluna Holdings, Inc | TRAKReposiTrak, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding QMLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $3.20▼ 0.21 (6.16%) | $0.72▼ 0.02 (2.70%) | $0.534▼ 0.03 (4.64%) | $7.23▼ 0.03 (0.41%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 5.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $100.9M | $124.1M | $54.8M | $131.5M | |
| Revenue | $13.2M | — | $29.7M | $23.3M | |
| Profit | -$5.4M | $9.3M | -$53.4M | $7.6M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 62.5% | — | -21.8% | 3.0% | -9.4% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 49.1% | — | 6.1% | 85.8% | 45.9% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -85.3% | — | -113.3% | 33.7% | -39.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -41.2% | — | -179.7% | 32.5% | -73.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -154.0% | — | -125.2% | 35.2% | -45.0% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -8.7% | -112.9% | -99.7% | 14.5% | -99.7% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -14.2% | — | -33.1% | 11.9% | -10.6% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 13.29x | — | 17.37x | 15.33x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | 15.52x | 15.52x |
| Price to book | 1.62x | -15.01x | 1.02x | 2.51x | 1.02x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.43x | -1.27x | 1.41x | 0.16x | 0.16x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/9 | 3/6 | 4/9 | 7/9 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | n/a for banks | safe |
How QMLS compares with the others
- QMLS's operating margin of -85.3% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (-39.8%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 62.5% against -9.4%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.4x against 0.2x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.