How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | PARPAR TECHNOLOGY CORP | CDChaince Digital Holdings Inc. | DSPViant Technology Inc. | MITKMITEK SYSTEMS INC | Median of the restexcluding PAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $17.85▼ 0.32 (1.76%) | $8.76▲ 0.56 (6.76%) | $13.81▲ 0.21 (1.54%) | $18.64▲ 0.78 (4.37%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $725.7M | $638.5M | $918.3M | $850.7M | |
| Revenue | $455.5M | $1.9M | $344.2M | $179.7M | |
| Profit | -$84.5M | -$5.1M | $8.4M | $8.8M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 30.2% | 277.9% | 19.0% | 4.4% | 19.0% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 43.5% | 64.3% | 45.8% | — | 55.0% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -15.1% | -202.0% | 3.5% | 9.3% | 3.5% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -18.5% | -273.0% | 2.4% | 4.9% | 2.4% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -6.7% | — | 15.0% | 30.2% | 22.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -10.2% | -11.6% | 10.2% | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -4.8% | -29.2% | 12.1% | 14.1% | 12.1% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | 109.96x | 96.71x | 103.33x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 29.84x | 38.74x | 34.29x |
| Price to book | 0.88x | 14.50x | 11.18x | 3.54x | 11.18x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.66x | 0.06x | 2.26x | 0.91x | 0.91x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 3/9 | 4/8 | 8/9 | 5/8 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | n/a for banks | safe | grey |
How PAR compares with the others
- PAR's operating margin of -15.1% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (3.5%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 30.2% against 19.0%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.7x against 0.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.