How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | OXMOXFORD INDUSTRIES INC | UAAUnder Armour, Inc. | GIIIG III APPAREL GROUP LTD /DE/ | CRICARTERS INC | Median of the restexcluding OXM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $28.35▲ 2.30 (8.83%) | $4.80▼ 0.08 (1.64%) | $29.29▼ 0.49 (1.65%) | $33.93▲ 1.45 (4.46%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Market value | $425.3M | $2.05B | $1.24B | $1.24B | |
| Revenue | $1.48B | $4.97B | $2.96B | $2.90B | |
| Profit | -$27.9M | -$495.6M | $67.4M | $91.8M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -2.6% | -3.8% | -7.0% | 1.9% | -3.8% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 60.7% | 45.5% | 39.4% | 45.4% | 45.4% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -2.1% | -3.3% | 3.7% | 5.0% | 3.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -1.9% | -10.0% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 2.3% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 0.8% | -3.3% | 8.9% | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -5.4% | -35.0% | 3.8% | 9.9% | 3.8% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -4.0% | -5.6% | 4.8% | 11.5% | 4.8% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | 18.35x | 13.46x | 15.91x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 21.40x | — | 6.29x | 6.73x | 6.51x |
| Price to book | 0.83x | 1.45x | 0.70x | 1.34x | 1.34x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.54x | 2.12x | 0.48x | 1.77x | 1.77x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 3/9 | 3/9 | 5/9 | 5/9 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | safe | grey |
How OXM compares with the others
- OXM's operating margin of -2.1% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (3.7%).
- Its revenue growth of -2.6% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (-3.8%).
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.5x against 1.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.