How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | OWLBLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. | ARESAres Management Corp | TROWPRICE T ROWE GROUP INC | PSPERSHING SQUARE INC. | Median of the restexcluding OWL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $9.71▲ 0.54 (5.89%) | $123.70▲ 6.69 (5.72%) | $103.29▲ 1.16 (1.14%) | $45.04▼ 1.74 (3.72%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 4.7/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Market value | $6.36B | $40.86B | $22.58B | $18.02B | |
| Revenue | $2.87B | $5.60B | $7.31B | $750.0M | |
| Profit | $78.8M | $527.4M | $2.09B | -$210.1M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 25.0% | 44.2% | 3.1% | 64.7% | 44.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | — | — | — | 94.6% | 94.6% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | — | 29.9% | -47.2% | -8.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 2.7% | 9.4% | 28.5% | -28.0% | 9.4% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 41.7% | — | 20.2% | -18.0% | 1.1% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 3.6% | 12.3% | 19.2% | -12.3% | 12.3% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 21.2% | -14.5% | 3.4% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 80.65x | 77.47x | 10.82x | — | 44.14x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 2.88x | 9.56x | 2.08x | 10.56x | 9.56x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 2.91x | 4.66x | 0.21x | 0.60x | 0.60x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/7 | 5/5 | 3/6 | 2/9 | 3.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks |
How OWL compares with the others
- OWL's profit margin of 2.7% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (9.4%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 25.0% against 44.2%.
- It trades at a higher P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 80.7x against 44.1x.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 2.9x against 0.6x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.