How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | NWFLNORWOOD FINANCIAL CORP | RVRFRiver Financial Corp | MVBFMVB FINANCIAL CORP | FMOOF&M Bancorp | Median of the restexcluding NWFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | — | |
| Price | $34.77▲ 0.20 (0.58%) | $50.00▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | $30.00▲ 0.09 (0.30%) | $65.40▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | not reported | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $322.1M | $387.3M | $381.5M | $319.2M | |
| Revenue | $8.0M | — | — | — | |
| Profit | $27.8M | $42.1M | $26.9M | — | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 8.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 347.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 365.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 11.5% | 14.3% | 8.1% | — | 11.2% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 11.60x | 9.20x | 14.17x | — | 11.68x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 1.33x | 1.32x | 1.14x | — | 1.23x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 9.01x | 11.88x | 8.91x | — | 10.39x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/6 | 5/5 | 4/5 | not reported | 4.5 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | not reported |
How NWFL compares with the others
- It trades at a P/E in line with the median of the other companies selected (11.6x against 11.7x).
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 9.0x against 10.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.