How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | NLOPNet Lease Office Properties | JBGSJBG SMITH Properties | HPPHudson Pacific Properties, Inc. | BDNBRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST | Median of the restexcluding NLOP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $9.71▲ 0.06 (0.62%) | $11.39▲ 0.68 (6.35%) | $10.58▲ 1.12 (11.84%) | $2.95▲ 0.25 (9.26%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 |
| Market value | $143.8M | $939.2M | $573.7M | $512.4M | |
| Revenue | $118.9M | $498.6M | $831.1M | $484.5M | |
| Profit | -$145.3M | -$139.1M | -$592.3M | -$178.2M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -16.4% | -8.9% | -1.3% | -4.2% | -4.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | — | — | 48.5% | 61.8% | 55.2% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | — | — | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -122.2% | -27.9% | -71.3% | -36.8% | -36.8% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | — | — | -2.8% | 17.2% | 7.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -49.4% | -12.0% | -19.9% | -22.5% | -19.9% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 0.49x | 0.81x | 0.19x | 0.65x | 0.65x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.53x | 2.35x | 1.37x | 3.52x | 2.35x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/7 | 5/6 | 4/7 | 4/8 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | not reported | n/a for banks |
How NLOP compares with the others
- NLOP's profit margin of -122.2% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (-36.8%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -16.4% against -4.2%.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.5x against 2.3x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.