How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | LEALEAR CORP | BWABORGWARNER INC | 1316.HK1316.HK | GNTXGENTEX CORP | Median of the restexcluding LEA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $118.61▲ 0.72 (0.61%) | $57.45▼ 1.12 (1.91%) | HK$4.25▼ 0.09 (2.19%) | $21.26▲ 0.39 (1.87%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $6.36B | $11.90B | $10.67B | $4.58B | |
| Revenue | $23.26B | $14.32B | $35.94B | $2.53B | |
| Profit | $436.8M | $277.0M | $799.7M | $384.8M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -0.2% | 1.6% | 7.2% | 9.6% | 7.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 6.5% | 18.7% | 11.4% | 34.2% | 18.7% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 3.3% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 18.7% | 3.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 1.9% | 1.9% | 2.2% | 15.2% | 2.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 2.3% | 8.2% | 3.1% | 18.1% | 8.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 8.7% | 5.1% | 4.8% | 15.5% | 5.1% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 8.1% | 4.0% | 5.7% | 16.9% | 5.7% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 14.56x | 42.94x | 13.34x | 11.90x | 13.34x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 5.84x | 10.74x | 2.07x | 7.68x | 7.68x |
| Price to book | 1.26x | 2.19x | 0.64x | 1.84x | 1.84x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.95x | 1.50x | 0.76x | 0.18x | 0.76x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/9 | 6/9 | 8/9 | 6/8 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | grey | safe | safe | safe |
How LEA compares with the others
- LEA's operating margin of 3.3% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (3.7%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -0.2% against 7.2%.
- It trades at a P/E in line with the median of the other companies selected (14.6x against 13.3x).
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.9x against 0.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.