How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc. | AMTMAmentum Holdings, Inc. | FCNFTI CONSULTING, INC | EXPOEXPONENT INC | Median of the restexcluding HURN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $193.35▲ 10.03 (5.47%) | $21.29▲ 1.14 (5.66%) | $157.59▲ 8.22 (5.50%) | $77.11▲ 3.96 (5.41%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $3.42B | $5.18B | $4.86B | $3.80B | |
| Revenue | $1.70B | $14.39B | $3.79B | $582.0M | |
| Profit | $105.0M | $66.0M | $270.9M | $106.0M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 11.7% | 71.6% | 2.4% | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 33.9% | 10.5% | 32.1% | — | 21.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 10.5% | 3.3% | 10.3% | 20.6% | 10.3% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 6.2% | 0.5% | 7.1% | 18.2% | 7.1% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 10.8% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 21.0% | 3.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 19.9% | 1.5% | 15.6% | 27.2% | 15.6% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 13.7% | 3.4% | 15.5% | 51.2% | 15.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 32.54x | 78.54x | 17.96x | 35.83x | 35.83x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 18.50x | 16.71x | 11.41x | — | 14.06x |
| Price to book | 6.47x | 1.15x | 2.81x | 9.73x | 2.81x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.89x | 1.52x | 1.01x | 0.99x | 1.01x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/9 | 8/9 | 5/9 | 5/7 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | grey | safe | safe |
How HURN compares with the others
- HURN's operating margin of 10.5% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (10.3%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 11.7% against 4.2%.
- It trades at a P/E in line with the median of the other companies selected (32.5x against 35.8x).
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.9x against 1.0x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.