How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | GRWGGrowGeneration Corp. | HDHOME DEPOT, INC. | LOWLOWES COMPANIES INC | FNDFloor & Decor Holdings, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding GRWG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $1.43▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | $327.73▲ 13.59 (4.33%) | $204.37▲ 7.81 (3.97%) | $48.17▲ 3.06 (6.78%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 2.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Market value | $85.9M | $326.42B | $114.65B | $5.19B | |
| Revenue | $161.7M | $164.68B | $86.29B | $4.68B | |
| Profit | -$24.0M | $14.16B | $6.65B | $208.6M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -14.4% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 5.1% | 3.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 26.8% | 33.3% | 33.5% | 43.6% | 33.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -15.8% | 12.7% | 11.8% | 5.8% | 11.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -14.9% | 8.6% | 7.7% | 4.5% | 7.7% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | — | 7.7% | 8.9% | 1.4% | 7.7% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -24.7% | 110.5% | -67.1% | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -30.1% | 24.4% | 24.6% | 9.0% | 24.4% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 23.06x | 17.23x | 24.88x | 23.06x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 15.53x | 12.63x | 10.05x | 12.63x |
| Price to book | 0.88x | 25.48x | -11.56x | 2.16x | 2.16x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.51x | 7.20x | -6.46x | 1.27x | 1.27x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/8 | 5/9 | 6/9 | 8/9 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | safe | distress | safe |
How GRWG compares with the others
- GRWG's operating margin of -15.8% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (11.8%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -14.4% against 3.2%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.5x against 1.3x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.