How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | GPUSHyperscale Data, Inc. | MMM3M CO | HONHONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC | BBUC.TOBBUC.TO | Median of the restexcluding GPUS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $0.13▼ 0.01 (7.14%) | $175.56▲ 0.82 (0.47%) | $218.31▲ 3.58 (1.67%) | C$39.31▲ 1.36 (3.58%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 2.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $24.2M | $93.10B | $138.69B | $3.45B | |
| Revenue | $102.1M | $24.95B | $37.44B | $38.53B | |
| Profit | -$66.4M | $3.25B | $4.73B | $36.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -4.3% | 1.5% | 7.8% | -32.4% | 1.5% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 21.1% | 39.9% | 36.9% | 19.3% | 36.9% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -61.0% | 18.6% | 21.7% | 15.1% | 18.6% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -65.0% | 13.0% | 12.6% | 0.1% | 12.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -85.3% | 5.6% | 14.5% | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -55.4% | 69.1% | 34.0% | — | 51.6% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -25.9% | 29.6% | 19.3% | 8.2% | 19.3% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 28.64x | 29.33x | 94.50x | 29.33x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 16.92x | 16.94x | 5.94x | 16.92x |
| Price to book | 0.20x | 19.80x | 9.97x | — | 14.89x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.57x | 7.02x | 4.30x | — | 5.66x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/9 | 5/9 | 5/9 | 6/9 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | safe | safe | not reported |
How GPUS compares with the others
- GPUS's operating margin of -61.0% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (18.6%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -4.3% against 1.5%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.6x against 5.7x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.