How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | FORRFORRESTER RESEARCH, INC. | RHLDResolute Holdings Management, Inc. | BKSYBlackSky Technology Inc. | MGMistras Group, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding FORR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $12.44▲ 0.54 (4.54%) | $118.81▲ 3.57 (3.10%) | $16.69▼ 0.66 (3.80%) | $21.42▲ 0.11 (0.52%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 3.3/10 | 6.0/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $236.5M | $1.01B | $599.7M | $664.7M | |
| Revenue | $396.9M | $462.1M | $106.6M | $724.0M | |
| Profit | -$119.4M | -$5.9M | -$70.3M | $16.8M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -8.2% | 9.9% | 4.4% | -0.8% | 4.4% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 57.0% | 56.3% | — | 28.2% | 42.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -28.5% | 31.0% | -44.0% | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -30.1% | -1.3% | -65.9% | 2.3% | -1.3% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 4.6% | 41.0% | — | 1.1% | 21.1% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -94.3% | -90.8% | -74.1% | 7.2% | -74.1% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -91.1% | 377.9% | -14.6% | 7.9% | 7.9% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | 39.48x | 39.48x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 6.81x | — | 11.38x | 9.10x |
| Price to book | 1.87x | 154.83x | 6.32x | 2.83x | 6.32x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 2.19x | 39.19x | 3.07x | 1.46x | 3.07x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/9 | 5/9 | 1/8 | 7/9 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | n/a for banks | distress | grey |
How FORR compares with the others
- FORR's operating margin of -28.5% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (5.6%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -8.2% against 4.4%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 2.2x against 3.1x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.