How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | FLZHFlash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc. | UAVSAgEagle Aerial Systems Inc. | RYMRYTHM, Inc. | ARTWARTS WAY MANUFACTURING CO INC | Median of the restexcluding FLZH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $0.0321▼ 0.01 (14.63%) | $0.6142▼ 0.03 (4.97%) | $15.63▼ 1.70 (9.81%) | $3.10▲ 0.02 (0.65%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 2.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Market value | $1.8M | $26.8M | $33.6M | $15.8M | |
| Revenue | $17.4M | $12.8M | $17.3M | $23.0M | |
| Profit | -$22.1M | -$5.3M | -$33.3M | $1.0M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -56.5% | -4.3% | 95916.7% | -6.2% | -4.3% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 1.0% | 51.8% | 59.0% | 27.3% | 51.8% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -103.5% | -115.0% | -187.1% | 1.3% | -115.0% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -127.0% | -41.2% | -192.4% | 4.5% | -41.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 3.1% | -78.3% | — | -6.7% | -42.5% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 48.9% | -14.8% | -255.4% | 7.8% | -14.8% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | -32.4% | — | 1.3% | -15.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | 15.22x | 15.22x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | 16.87x | 16.87x |
| Price to book | -0.04x | 0.75x | 2.58x | 1.18x | 1.18x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | -1.01x | 0.18x | 7.19x | 0.69x | 0.69x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/8 | 4/9 | 4/9 | 4/9 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | distress | safe |
How FLZH compares with the others
- FLZH's operating margin of -103.5% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-115.0%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -56.5% against -4.3%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: -1.0x against 0.7x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.