How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | BTCSBTCS Inc. | FATNFatpipe Inc/UT | VERIVeritone, Inc. | ROCRank One Computing Corp | Median of the restexcluding BTCS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $1.11▲ 0.02 (1.83%) | $5.31▼ 0.03 (0.56%) | $0.5905▲ 0.01 (2.16%) | $3.49▼ 0.11 (3.06%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $52.0M | $74.5M | $54.7M | $52.4M | |
| Revenue | $16.5M | $19.2M | $92.2M | $17.0M | |
| Profit | -$33.4M | $5.0M | -$111.7M | -$2.7M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 304.8% | 17.9% | -0.5% | 23.9% | 17.9% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 12.2% | 91.0% | 67.9% | 77.2% | 77.2% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | 18.7% | -88.1% | -11.8% | -11.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -202.2% | 25.9% | -121.2% | -15.8% | -15.8% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -59.4% | -4.3% | -63.1% | — | -33.7% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -23.9% | 19.7% | -164.0% | 915.9% | 19.7% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | 11.3% | -157.7% | — | -73.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 14.98x | — | — | 14.98x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 18.76x | — | — | 18.76x |
| Price to book | 0.37x | 2.95x | 0.80x | -179.37x | 0.80x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.54x | 0.37x | 1.68x | -24.83x | 0.37x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 1/8 | 4/9 | 2/8 | 3/8 | 3.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | safe | distress | distress |
How BTCS compares with the others
- BTCS's profit margin of -202.2% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (-15.8%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 304.8% against 17.9%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.5x against 0.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.