How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE | LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP | KLACKLA CORP | TERTERADYNE, INC | Median of the restexcluding AMAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $375.58▼ 33.36 (8.16%) | $263.45▼ 8.75 (3.21%) | $163.43▲ 1.69 (1.04%) | $308.75▼ 36.74 (10.63%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 9.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $297.83B | $329.65B | $213.60B | $48.19B | |
| Revenue | $28.37B | $23.23B | $13.58B | $3.19B | |
| Profit | $7.00B | $7.27B | $4.83B | $554.0M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 4.4% | 26.0% | 11.7% | 13.1% | 13.1% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 48.7% | 50.5% | 61.3% | 58.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 29.2% | 35.3% | — | 20.4% | 27.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 24.7% | 31.3% | 35.6% | 17.4% | 31.3% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 20.1% | 21.1% | 27.7% | 14.1% | 21.1% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 34.3% | 58.3% | 76.1% | 19.8% | 58.3% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 31.9% | 67.9% | — | 20.4% | 44.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 42.56x | 45.37x | 44.22x | 86.98x | 45.37x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 34.23x | 38.19x | — | 61.82x | 50.00x |
| Price to book | 14.59x | 26.43x | 33.64x | 17.24x | 26.43x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.78x | 0.89x | 1.83x | 0.50x | 0.89x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/9 | 8/9 | 7/9 | 6/8 | 7.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | safe | safe | safe |
How AMAT compares with the others
- AMAT's operating margin of 29.2% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (27.8%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 4.4% against 13.1%.
- It trades at a P/E in line with the median of the other companies selected (42.6x against 45.4x).
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.8x against 0.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.