How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | AKOMAerkomm Inc. | OMCCOLD MARKET CAPITAL Corp | SURGSurgePays, Inc. | KTELKonaTel, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding AKOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $0.0411▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | $3.90▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | $0.1258▲ 0.01 (4.83%) | $0.038▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 2.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Market value | $807.8K | $26.1M | $2.7M | $1.7M | |
| Revenue | — | $9.4M | $57.0M | $8.5M | |
| Profit | -$18.3M | -$5.1M | -$36.1M | -$2.6M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | — | — | -6.4% | -45.5% | -26.0% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | — | — | -18.6% | 30.9% | 6.2% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | -74.3% | -59.9% | -31.7% | -59.9% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | — | -55.0% | -63.3% | -31.3% | -55.0% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | — | -110.1% | -37.4% | — | -73.8% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 248.7% | -9.7% | 235.0% | -689.0% | -9.7% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -1808.0% | -18.7% | -241.6% | — | -130.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | -0.11x | 0.49x | -0.17x | 4.35x | 0.49x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | -10.52x | 0.20x | -1.56x | 5.41x | 0.20x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 2/6 | 4/8 | 4/9 | 4/8 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | n/a for banks | distress | distress |
How AKOM compares with the others
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: -10.5x against 0.2x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.